Draft Research Plan
Osteoporosis to Prevent Fractures: Screening
August 12, 2021
Recommendations made by the USPSTF are independent of the U.S. government. They should not be construed as an official position of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Abbreviation: DXA=dual energy X-ray absorptiometry.
1. Does screening for fracture risk or osteoporosis reduce fractures and fracture-related morbidity and mortality in adults?
2a. What is the predictive accuracy of risk assessment tools for identifying adults who are at increased risk for hip fractures and major osteoporotic fractures?
2b. What is the predictive accuracy of bone mineral density testing with dual X-ray absorptiometry at central skeletal sites for identifying adults who are at increased risk for hip or major osteoporotic fractures?
2c. What is the diagnostic accuracy of risk assessment tools for identifying adults with osteoporosis?
2d. What is the evidence to determine screening intervals, and how do these vary by baseline fracture risk?
3. What are the harms of screening for fracture risk or osteoporosis?
4. What is the effectiveness of pharmacotherapy with selected Food and Drug Administration (FDA)–approved medications on fracture incidence and fracture-related morbidity and mortality?
5. What are the harms associated with selected FDA-approved medications?
Contextual questions will not be systematically reviewed and are not shown in the Analytic Framework.
- What is the evidence from modeling studies about the effectiveness of risk-screening strategies that use different ages at which to start and stop screening and different screening intervals?
- How do various fracture risk assessment tools use race and ethnicity in fracture risk calculations?
- What is the incidence of fragility fractures among persons of different races and ethnicities in the United States in the last 10 to 15 years, and what factors might explain differences in incidence among different races and ethnicities?
- What are the differences in rates of screening or treatment initiation among persons of different races and ethnicities, and what might explain these differences?
- What are the implications of using fixed fracture-risk thresholds for decisions regarding stepwise screening or treatment?
Included | Excluded | |
---|---|---|
Population | KQs 1–3 (Screening benefits, accuracy, harms): Adults age 40 years or older without known osteoporosis or history of fragility fractures
KQs 4, 5 (Treatment benefits and harms): Adults age 40 years or older with osteoporosis, osteopenia, or increased fracture risk (as defined by study authors) Studies where less than 50% of the enrolled population includes persons with conditions or medications listed as exclusion criteria will be included, and results will be stratified if possible. |
All KQs: Studies that exclusively enroll adults younger than age 40 years
KQs 1–3: Studies that exclusively enroll
|
Screening Interventions | KQs 1–3 (Screening benefits, accuracy, and harms):
|
|
Screening Comparators | KQs 1, 3 (Screening benefits and harms):
KQ 2 (Accuracy):
|
KQs 1, 3:
|
Treatment Interventions | KQs 4, 5 (Treatment benefits and harms): Bisphosphonates with FDA-approved indications for the prevention or treatment of osteoporosis (i.e., alendronate, ibandronate, risedronate, zoledronic acid), denosumab
Males only: teriparatide, abaloparatide, and romosozumab are also eligible |
KQs 4, 5:
|
Treatment Comparators | KQs 4, 5 (Treatment benefits and harms): Placebo, vitamin D or calcium or both, no treatment |
|
Outcomes | KQs 1, 4 (Screening and treatment benefits):
KQ 2 (Accuracy):
KQ 3 (Screening harms):
KQ 5 (Treatment harms):
|
KQs 1, 4:
KQs 2, 3, 5: Outcomes not specifically identified as included |
Timing | KQs 1, 4 (Screening and treatment benefits): Followup for at least 1 year
KQ 2 (Accuracy): For predictive accuracy, observed fracture incidence in calibration population over at least 10 years. For diagnostic accuracy, no longer than 8 weeks between FRA and BMD measurement. KQs 3, 5 (Screening and treatment harms): Any length of followup |
KQs 1, 4: Followup less than 1 year
KQ 2: For predictive accuracy, observed fracture incidence less than 10 years. For diagnostic accuracy, more than 8 weeks between risk assessment and BMD measurement. |
Study Design | KQs 1, 3 (Screening benefits and harms): RCTs, clinical controlled trials, or systematic reviews of RCTs or controlled trials. Cohort studies and systematic reviews of cohort studies are also eligible for KQ 3 only.
KQ 2 (Accuracy): Recent (published in the last 5 years) systematic reviews of cohort or test accuracy studies, cohort studies designed for evaluating predictive accuracy (i.e., prognosis for fracture risk) or diagnostic accuracy (for identification of osteoporosis), comparative studies where a single group is treated as a cohort for purposes of evaluating predictive or diagnostic accuracy are also eligible KQs 4, 5 (Treatment benefits and harms): RCTs and controlled trials; large, controlled cohort studies are also eligible for KQ 5 only |
Case series; case reports; case-control studies; conference abstracts, posters, or proceedings without data or information available to assess risk of bias; unpublished data; editorials; commentaries; narrative reviews |
Settings | KQs 1, 3, 4, 5 (Screening and treatment benefits and harms): Primary care settings in countries designated as “very high” on the 2020 Human Development Index (as defined by the United Nations Development Programme)
KQ 2 (Accuracy): Predictive accuracy: United States or countries with similar hip fracture incidence as the United States† for synthesis of any primary research studies |
KQs 1, 3, 4, 5: Long-term care settings such as nursing homes, inpatient settings
KQs 1, 3: Specialty medical settings (e.g., endocrinology, rheumatology) KQ 2: Predictive accuracy: studies in single countries with high or low fracture incidence |
Study Quality | Good or fair quality as determined by standard risk of bias instruments and existing USPSTF criteria tailored to study design | Poor quality |
* Major osteoporotic fracture is typically defined as fractures of the hip, wrist, and humerus and clinical vertebral fractures.
† Countries with “moderate” hip fracture incidence in addition to the United States include Finland, France, Canada, New Zealand, Lithuania, Malaysia, South Korea, Portugal, Japan, Israel, Australia, Russia, The Netherlands, Kuwait, Spain, Mexico, Estonia, Poland, Chile, and Thailand.1
Abbreviations: BMD=bone mineral density; CT=computerized tomography; DXA=dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry; FDA=Food and Drug Administration; FRA=fracture risk assessment; KQ=key question; NHANES=National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey; RCT=randomized, controlled trial; USPSTF=U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.