Final Research Plan
Obesity in Children and Adolescents: Screening
February 12, 2015
Recommendations made by the USPSTF are independent of the U.S. government. They should not be construed as an official position of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
The final Research Plan will be used to guide a systematic review of the evidence by researchers at an Evidence-based Practice Center. The resulting Evidence Review will form the basis of the USPSTF Recommendation Statement on this topic.
The draft Research Plan was available for comment from October 23 until November 19, 2014 at 5:00 p.m., ET.
*Blood pressure, lipid levels, and insulin resistance are secondary outcomes when reported with weight.
Abbreviations: BMI = body mass index; CV = cardiovascular; KQ = key question; QOL = quality of life.
Figure 1 is the analytic framework that depicts the five Key Questions (KQs) to be addressed in the systematic review. The figure illustrates how weight screening programs in children and adolescents may improve health outcomes or reduce obesity in adulthood (KQ1). Interventions may result in changes in health outcomes and reduced obesity in adulthood (KQ3) and reduced weight or age-associated weight gain (KQ4). The analytic framework also depicts the possible adverse events occurring after screening (KQ2) or treatment (KQ5).
- Do screening programs for obesity in children and adolescents reduce excess weight or age-associated excess weight gain, improve health outcomes during childhood, or reduce obesity in adulthood?
- Are there effects of screening on cardiometabolic measures (i.e., blood pressure, lipid levels, and insulin resistance)?
- Are there common components of efficacious screening programs?
- Does efficacy differ by key patient subgroups (i.e., age, race/ethnicity, sex, and socioeconomic status)?
- Does screening for obesity in children and adolescents have adverse effects?
- Do weight management interventions* for children and adolescents that are primary care feasible or referable from primary care improve health outcomes during childhood or reduce obesity in adulthood?
- Does efficacy differ by key patient subgroups (i.e., age, race/ethnicity, sex, degree of excess weight, and socioeconomic status)?
- Are there common components of efficacious interventions?
- Do weight management interventions* for children and adolescents that are primary care feasible or referable from primary care reduce excess weight or age-associated excess weight gain?
- Do weight management interventions affect cardiometabolic measures (i.e., blood pressure, lipid levels, and insulin resistance)?
- Are there common components of efficacious interventions?
- Does efficacy differ by key patient subgroups (i.e., age, race/ethnicity, sex, degree of excess weight, and socioeconomic status)?
- Do weight management interventions* for children and adolescents have adverse effects?
*Weight management interventions include behavioral counseling, pharmacotherapy, and health care system–level approaches.
Contextual questions will not be systematically reviewed and are not shown in the Analytic Framework.
- Are improvements in child weight outcomes associated with reduced likelihood of adult obesity? If so, how much improvement (e.g., weight loss, reduction in age- and sex-specific body mass index [BMI] percentile) is necessary to reduce the likelihood of adult obesity?
- Is the medication bupropion being used for weight management in children and adolescents? If so, is there evidence supporting its use in children and adolescents?
The Research Approach identifies the study characteristics and criteria that the Evidence-based Practice Center will use to search for publications and to determine whether identified studies should be included or excluded from the Evidence Review. Criteria are overarching as well as specific to each of the key questions (KQs).
Include | Exclude | |
---|---|---|
Condition definition | Studies identifying children who are overweight or obese using methods such as BMI, BMI percentile, BMI z-score, percent overweight, waist circumference, or a similar measure | |
Aim | KQs 1, 2 (screening): Studies of programs that systematically screen children and adolescents to identify those who are overweight or obese
KQs 3–5 (interventions): Studies with a primary aim of weight management (including weight loss and weight gain prevention) |
KQs 1, 2 (screening): Intervention programs for diet or physical activity without a weight-related measure
KQs 3–5 (interventions): Healthy lifestyle counseling with no weight-related aim |
Population | All KQs: Children and adolescents ages 2 to 18 years; studies that substantially overlap this age range (e.g., ages 14–65 years) will be included if results for younger participants are reported separately
KQs 1, 2 (screening): General primary care or comparable populations KQs 3–5 (interventions): Either:
or
|
|
Intervention | KQs 1, 2 (screening): Screening involving BMI or other primary care–feasible anthropomorphic measure; may also involve treatment or referral after screening
KQs 3–5 (interventions):
|
KQs 3–5 (interventions):
|
Comparator | KQs 1, 2 (screening): Usual care, no obesity screening
KQs 3–5 (interventions): Control groups with no intervention (e.g., wait-list control, usual care), minimal intervention (e.g., pamphlets, single annual session presenting information similar to what intervention groups receive through usual care in a primary care setting), or attention control (e.g., similar format and intensity of intervention on a different content area) |
Comparative effectiveness studies; the following components are too intensive to be considered usual care, so would be considered active comparators, including:
Comparator cannot be focused on healthy lifestyle, as this is too similar to intervention programs for weight loss |
Outcomes | Child health outcomes:
Adult health outcomes: Obesity Intermediate outcomes:
Adverse effects:
|
Behavioral outcomes (diet, physical activity) |
Timing of outcome assessment | All KQs (except serious harms of pharmacotherapy): ≥6 months after baseline
KQ 5 (serious harms of pharmacotherapy): No minimum followup; serious harms are events resulting in death, hospitalization, or the need for urgent medical treatment |
|
Setting | All KQs: Primary care settings (e.g., pediatrics, internal medicine, family medicine, obstetrics/gynecology, family planning, military health clinics)
KQs 3–5 (interventions):
|
|
Study design | All KQs: Randomized, controlled trials; controlled clinical trials
KQ 5 (harms of weight loss medications): Large comparative cohort or case-control studies with appropriate comparison group; large case-series; large case-series; large event monitoring studies |
All other study designs
|
Country | Economically developed countries (i.e., countries that are a member of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development): Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Chile, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan, Korea, Luxembourg, Mexico, The Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, United Kingdom, and United States | Countries that are not a member of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development |
Language | English | Languages other than English |
Study quality | Fair or good | Poor, according to design-specific USPSTF criteria |
The draft Research Plan was posted for public comment on the USPSTF Web site from October 23 to November 19, 2014. The USPSTF received comments from 31 individuals and organizations. The USPSTF received comments requesting that children and adolescents with severe obesity be considered as a special subgroup. In response, the USPSTF added degree of excess weight to the list of a priori patient subgroups to examine. The USPSTF received a comment requesting that studies limited to college students be excluded. In response, the USPSTF added this population to the exclusion criteria. In addition, minor wording changes were made to the inclusion and exclusion criteria to improve clarity and accuracy.