Final Research Plan
Drug Use, Illicit: Primary Care Interventions for Children and Adolescents
May 15, 2013
Recommendations made by the USPSTF are independent of the U.S. government. They should not be construed as an official position of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
The final Research Plan is used to guide a systematic review of the evidence by researchers at an Evidence-based Practice Center. The resulting Evidence Report forms the basis of the USPSTF Recommendation Statement on this topic.
The draft Research Plan was available for comment from January 15 until February 11, 2013 at 5:00 p.m., ET.
This figure is the analytic framework that depicts the three key questions (KQs) to be addressed in the systematic review. The figure illustrates how interventions to reduce the illicit or nonmedical use of drugs may improve health, social, and legal outcomes (KQ 1) in children and adolescents (age 18 years and younger) who may or may not be currently using drugs. The figure also depicts how these interventions may also influence behaviors such as preventing drug use initiation and reducing the frequency and/or quantity of misuse (KQ 2). The figure also depicts whether these interventions have any potential harms (KQ 3).
-
Do primary care–relevant behavioral counseling interventions for drug use, with or without referral, improve mortality, morbidity, and other long-term outcomes in children and adolescents?
- Do outcomes differ in subgroups (e.g., as defined by age, risk level, sex, race, ethnicity, types of substances used)?
- What are elements of efficacious interventions?
- What criteria are used to identify children and adolescents for primary care drug use interventions?
-
Do primary care–relevant behavioral counseling interventions, with or without referral, prevent drug use initiation in children and adolescents who do not currently use drugs or reduce drug use in children and adolescents who currently use drugs?
- Do outcomes differ in subgroups (e.g., as defined by age, risk level, sex, race, ethnicity, types of substances used)?
- What are elements of efficacious interventions?
- What criteria are used to identify children and adolescents for primary care drug use interventions?
- What are the adverse effects of primary care–relevant behavioral counseling drug use interventions?
- What are the performance characteristics of currently available primary care–feasible screening instruments to detect drug use and/or misuse in children and adolescents?
- Are children and adolescents identified as misusing drugs or at risk for drug misuse through primary care screening comparable with patients who are included in effective primary care treatment?
The Research Approach identifies the study characteristics and criteria that the Evidence-based Practice Center will use to search for publications and to determine whether identified studies should be included or excluded from the Evidence Report. Criteria are overarching as well as specific to each of the key questions.
Include | Exclude | |
---|---|---|
Aim | Preventing and/or reducing drug use is a primary aim, with or without addressing other substances or behaviors (e.g., addressing drug use and alcohol and tobacco use, addressing drug use and risky sexual behaviors) | Targeting another behavior is only aim (e.g., alcohol misuse, tobacco use); that is, change in drug use is not a stated aim, but is the reported outcome |
Condition |
Children or adolescents who are at the following stages of use: 1) never use, 2) experimentation, 3) regular use, or 4) problem use
Use of the following drugs:
*Not included in 2008 review |
|
Population |
Children and adolescents (age <18 years) (includes studies in which >50% of participants are age <18 years OR the subgroup of participants age <18 years is analyzed and reported separately from adults), including trials limited to targeted groups with cognitive, mental health, or other health issues and trials limited to pregnant adolescents |
|
Interventions |
Primary care–relevant** behavioral counseling interventions designed primarily to prevent or reduce the nonmedical use of drugs, with or without referral. Including, but not limited to: advice, brief intervention†, motivational interviewing, action plans, written materials, and personalized feedback
**Conducted in primary care (i.e., office-based) or judged to be feasible or applicable to primary care:
†Typically delivered to those individuals at low to moderate risk. Goal is to provide education or advice, increase motivation to avoid substance use, or to teach behavior change skills that will reduce substance use as well as the chances of negative consequences. Usually involves 1 to 2 sessions each lasting 5 minutes to 1 hour ‡Interventions that only include electronic modes for intervention delivery (e.g., Web-based, CD-ROMs) that are not conducted in or connected to health care will also be included in the review |
|
Comparators |
|
Active intervention (i.e., more than a single brief contact per year or brief written materials); comparative effectiveness |
Outcomes |
KQ 1: (health, social, educational, and other outcomes):
Health outcomes:
Social, educational, or other outcomes:
KQ 2: (behavioral outcomes) (Based on self-report or toxicology screen; will favor outcomes with biochemical verification)
KQ 3: (adverse events)
|
|
Outcome assessment timing |
≥6-month followup postbaseline assessment (26 weeks)
(Note: Studies with shorter followup will not be excluded at the title/abstract review phase so that the number of studies that would be excluded for this reason only can be evaluated) |
<6-month followup postbaseline assessment |
Setting |
|
|
Study design |
KQs 1–3:
|
KQs 1–3:
|
Study geography | Developed countries; rated “Very High” according to the 2011 Human Development Index: Andorra, Argentina, Australia, Austria, Bahrain, Barbados, Belgium, Brunei Darussalam, Canada, Chile, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hong Kong, China, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan, Korea, Latvia, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Qatar, Singapore, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Arab Emirates, United Kingdom, United States | Countries with a Human Development Index below “Very High” |
Publication language | English | Any language other than English |
Publication date | 1992 to present | Studies published before 1992 |
Quality rating | Fair or good quality | Poor quality |
The draft Research Plan was posted for public comment on the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) Web site from January 15 to February 11, 2013. The USPSTF reviewed and considered all comments when finalizing the Research Plan. Several comments suggested that the USPSTF broaden the age range to include young adults up to age 25 years, while other comments advocated including studies of patients who are seeking care for drug treatment; however, these populations are outside the scope of this review, which focuses on prevention in children and adolescents. A future update on this topic will focus on young adults and adults. The USPSTF received comments noting that interventions done in the emergency department might be appropriate for the primary care setting; studies that take place in the emergency department and meet other inclusion criteria were added to the inclusion criteria. A few other minor changes were made to clarify inclusion criteria and outcomes. One comment suggested that the review focus on all substances, including alcohol and tobacco; this approach will be considered in a future review.
Current as of May 2013