Final Research Plan
Screening for Depression in Adults
July 03, 2014
Recommendations made by the USPSTF are independent of the U.S. government. They should not be construed as an official position of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
The final Research Plan is used to guide a systematic review of the evidence by researchers at an Evidence-based Practice Center. The resulting Evidence Report will form the basis of the USPSTF Recommendation Statement on this topic.
The draft Research Plan was available for comment from March 27 until April 23, 2014 at 5:00 p.m., ET.
General Adult Population, Including Older Adults
Pregnant and Postpartum Women
General Adult Population, Including Older Adults
-
Do primary care depression screening programs in the general adult population, including older adults, result in improved health outcomes (decreased depressive symptomatology; decreased suicide deaths, attempts, or ideation; improved functioning; improved quality of life; or improved health status)?
- Does sending depression screening test results to providers (with or without additional care management supports) result in improved health outcomes?
- Does the effect of screening vary by population characteristics*?
-
What are the harms associated with primary care depression screening programs in the general adult population, including older adults?
- Do the harms vary by population characteristics*?
Pregnant and Postpartum Women
-
Do primary care depression screening programs in pregnant and postpartum women result in improved health outcomes (decreased depressive symptomatology; decreased suicide deaths, attempts, or ideation; improved functioning; improved quality of life; or improved health status)?
- Does sending depression screening test results to providers (with or without additional care management supports) result in improved health outcomes?
- Does the effect of screening vary by population characteristics*?
-
What is the test performance of the most commonly used depression screening instruments in pregnant and postpartum women in primary care?
- Do the test performance characteristics of the screening instruments vary by population characteristics*?
-
What are the harms associated with primary care depression screening programs in pregnant and postpartum women?
- Do the harms vary by population characteristics*?
-
Does treatment (psychotherapy, antidepressants, or collaborative care) result in improved health outcomes (decreased depressive symptomatology; decreased suicide deaths, attempts, or ideation; improved functioning; improved quality of life; or improved health status) in pregnant and postpartum women who screen positive for depression in primary care?
- Do the effects of the interventions vary by population characteristics*?
-
What are the harms of treatment in pregnant and postpartum who screen positive for depression in primary care?
- Do the harms vary by population characteristics*?
- What is the prevalence of other selected serious harms of treatment with antidepressants in the general (i.e., not limited to primary care) population of pregnant and postpartum women?
* Population characteristics include sex, age, race/ethnicity, comorbid conditions, and new-onset depression versus recurrent depression.
Contextual questions will not be systematically reviewed and are not shown in the Analytic Framework.
- How effective are usual care methods in identifying patients with depression (i.e., do they avoid underdiagnosis and overdiagnosis)?
- What is the acceptability of primary care depression screening to providers and patients?
- How is treatment managed in patients who screen positive for depression (e.g., how likely is it that treatment will be initiated or recommended by the provider and accepted by the patient, and how likely is the patient to receive a full therapeutic dose of treatment)? What is the acceptability of depression treatment to patients and providers?
- Is treatment (psychotherapy or pharmacologic) effective for relatively mild depression?
- Is treatment (psychotherapy or pharmacologic) effective for adults and older adults whose depression is identified through screening in primary care?
- What is the accuracy of the Patient Health Questionnaire and the Geriatric Depression Scale, two of the most commonly used depression screening instruments, in identifying patients with depression?
The Research Approach identifies the study characteristics and criteria that the Evidence-based Practice Center will use to search for publications and to determine whether identified studies should be included or excluded from the Evidence Report. Criteria are overarching as well as specific to each of the key questions (KQs).
Include | Exclude | |
---|---|---|
General Adult Population, Including Older Adults | ||
Condition definition | Focus on major depressive disorder, persistent depressive disorder/dysthymia, and depression not otherwise specified, or “depression” with no further diagnostic specificity | Trials restricted only to persons with bipolar disorder, schizoaffective disorder, seasonal affective disorder, cyclothymia, substance-induced mood disorder, minor depression, or adjustment disorder with depressed mood |
Aim | Studies targeting depression screening | Studies restricted to screening or treatment of suicidality, bipolar disorder, or treatment-resistant depression |
Population | Adults, including older adults, age 18 years and older |
|
Intervention | Brief standardized instrument designed to identify persons with depression (no more than 15 minutes if completed prior to visit, no more than 5 minutes if completed during visit); self-report, clinician-administered, or electronically delivered | Trials primarily using treatment modalities other than psychotherapy or FDA-approved antidepressants (e.g., exercise, electroshock treatment, St. John's wort, social marketing, policy, system-level interventions, or adjunctive agents to enhance the effects of antidepressants) |
Comparator | Usual care, no screening, and screening with no feedback of results to providers | |
Outcomes |
Benefits of screening (KQ 1):
Primary health outcomes
Other health outcomes
Harms of screening (KQ 3):
|
|
Timing of outcome assessment | ≥6 weeks after baseline | |
Setting |
|
|
Study design | RCTs, CCTs | All other study designs |
Country | Countries categorized as “Very High” on the Human Development Index (as defined by the World Health Organization) | Countries not categorized as “Very High” on the Human Development Index |
Language | English | Languages other than English |
Study quality | Fair or good | Poor, according to design-specific USPSTF criteria |
Pregnant and Postpartum Women | ||
Condition definition | Focus on major depressive disorder, persistent depressive disorder/dysthymia, and depression not otherwise specified, or “depression” with no further diagnostic specificity | Trials restricted only to persons with bipolar disorder, schizoaffective disorder, seasonal affective disorder, cyclothymia, substance-induced mood disorder, minor depression, or adjustment disorder with depressed mood |
Aim |
Screening (KQs 1, 3) and treatment (KQs 4, 5): Studies targeting depression screening and treatment
Diagnostic accuracy of screening (KQ 2): Studies addressing accuracy of depression screening instruments Harms of antidepressants (KQ 5): Studies addressing harms of antidepressants |
Studies restricted to screening or treatment of suicidality, bipolar disorder, or treatment-resistant depression |
Population |
Screening (KQs 1, 3): Pregnant and postpartum women age 18 years and older
Treatment (KQs 4, 5): Pregnant and postpartum women who screen positive for depression in a primary care setting or are identified through other population-based screening |
|
Intervention |
Screening (KQs 1, 3): Brief standardized instrument designed to identify persons with depression (no more than 15 minutes if completed prior to visit, no more than 5 minutes if completed during visit); self-report, clinician-administered, or electronically delivered
Instrument accuracy (KQ 2):): Limited to the most widely used screening tools in this population—the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ), in any form, including the related Primary Care Evaluation of Mental Disorders Patient Questionnaire (PRIME-MD, depression section), and the Edinburgh Postpartum Depression Scale (EPDS) Treatment (KQs 4, 5): Primary care–relevant interventions, including psychotherapy, FDA-approved antidepressants (except tricyclic antidepressants and monoamine oxidase inhibitors), and collaborative care |
Treatment modalities other than psychotherapy or FDA-approved antidepressants (e.g., exercise, electroshock treatment, St. John's wort, social marketing, policy, system-level interventions, or adjunctive agents to enhance the effects of antidepressants); tricyclic antidepressants and monoamine oxidase inhibitors |
Comparator |
Screening (KQs 1, 3): Usual care, no screening, and screening with no feedback of results to providers
Treatment (KQs 4, 5): Psychotherapy
Antidepressants
Collaborative care
|
Treatment (KQs 4, 5 ): Active intervention (i.e., comparative effectiveness) |
Outcomes |
Benefits of screening (KQ 1) and treatment (KQ 4):
Primary health outcomes
Other health outcomes
Diagnostic accuracy of screening (KQ 2):
Harms of screening (KQ 3):
Harms of antidepressant treatment (KQ 5):
|
|
Timing of outcome assessment |
Screening (KQs 1, 3): ≥6 weeks after baseline
Diagnostic accuracy of screening (KQ 2): Maximum of 2 weeks between screening and reference standard Treatment (KQs 4, 5):
|
|
Setting |
Harms of antidepressant treatment (KQ 5): Any outpatient clinical setting |
|
Study design |
Benefits of screening (KQ 1), harms of screening (KQ 3), and benefits of treatment (KQ 4): RCTs, CCTs
Diagnostic accuracy (KQ 2): Comparison with gold standard (structured or semistructured diagnostic interview or a nonbrief [>5 minutes] unstructured interview with mental health clinician) within 2 weeks of screening in populations that include a full spectrum of patient severity for the given setting (i.e., studies cannot limit patient pool to only nondepressed and known/highly likely depressed patients) Harms of antidepressant treatment (KQ 5): Systematic reviews; large comparative cohort or case-control observational studies published after identified systematic reviews that include observational studies “Large” is operationalized as:
|
All other study designs |
Country | Countries categorized as “Very High” on the Human Development Index (as defined by the World Health Organization) | Countries not categorized as “Very High” on the Human Development Index |
Language | English | Languages other than English |
Study quality | Fair or good | Poor, according to design-specific USPSTF criteria |
Abbreviations: FDA = Food and Drug Administration; RCT = randomized, controlled trial; CCT = controlled clinical trial.
The draft Research Plan for this topic was posted for public comment from March 27 to April 23, 2014. Several comments requested that the USPSTF examine the effects of a positive screen on subsequent treatment processes, such as treatment initiation, referral for treatment, referral acceptance, and compliance. To address these factors more fully, the USPSTF broadened one contextual question. The USPSTF also expanded the inclusion criteria for studies to include several outcomes (e.g., emergency department visits, inpatient stays, and several child-related outcomes for pregnant and postpartum women) in response to comments.