Final Research Plan
Screening for Depression, Anxiety, and Suicide Risk in Children and Adolescents
August 13, 2020
Recommendations made by the USPSTF are independent of the U.S. government. They should not be construed as an official position of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Abbreviation: KQ=key question.
- Do depression, anxiety, or suicide risk screening programs in primary care or comparable settings result in improved health outcomes in children and adolescents?
- Do instruments to screen for depression, anxiety, or suicide risk accurately identify children and adolescents with depression, anxiety, and increased risk of suicide in primary care or comparable settings?
- What are the harms associated with screening for depression, anxiety, or suicide risk in primary care or comparable settings in children and adolescents?
- Does treatment (psychotherapy, pharmacotherapy, or collaborative care) of depression, anxiety, or suicide risk result in improved health outcomes in children and adolescents?
- What are the harms of treatment (psychotherapy, pharmacotherapy, or collaborative care) in children and adolescents who are treated for depression, anxiety, or suicide risk?
Contextual questions will not be systematically reviewed and are not shown in the Analytic Framework.
- What is the diagnostic yield from screening for depression, anxiety, or suicide risk in typical primary care practice settings?
- What are the minimal clinically important differences (the smallest value of benefit to patients) for symptoms and functioning on the most common instruments used to measure response to treatment of depression, anxiety, or suicide risk?
- What are the U.S. Food and Drug Administration boxed warnings for pharmacotherapy for the treatment of depression, anxiety, or suicide risk in children and adolescents?
- What psychotherapies other than cognitive behavioral therapy are used to treat anxiety in children and adolescents?
- What is the effectiveness of evidence-based treatment in children and adolescents with persistent depressive disorder and depressive disorders not otherwise specified?
- What proportion of children and adolescents who screen positive for depression, anxiety, or increased suicide risk engage with care (i.e., return for clinical evaluation and treatment)?
The Research Approach identifies the study characteristics and criteria that the Evidence-based Practice Center will use to search for publications and to determine whether identified studies should be included or excluded from the Evidence Review. Criteria are overarching as well as specific to each of the key questions.
|Condition definition||Major depressive disorder, as defined by DSM criteria (present in at least 50% of the enrolled study population)
Anxiety disorders include generalized anxiety disorder, social anxiety disorder, panic disorder, agoraphobia, separation anxiety disorder, and selective mutism
Definitions for increased risk of suicide may vary by study but may include suicidal ideation (suicidal thoughts or plan for suicide), history of suicide attempts (nonfatal, self-directed, and potentially injurious behavior that is intended to result in death), and deliberate self-harm
Included studies may address these conditions individually or in combination
|Other mental health disorders (e.g., obsessive compulsive disorder, posttraumatic stress disorder, psychotic disorders, bipolar disorder, cyclothymia, adjustment disorder with depressed mood), persistent depressive disorder/dysthymia, disruptive mood dysregulation disorder, premenstrual dysphoric disorder, substance/medication-induced depressive disorder, depressive disorder due to another medical condition, and depression not otherwise specified; substance/medication-induced anxiety disorder, anxiety disorder due to another medical condition, and anxiety not otherwise specified|
|Population||KQs 1–3: Children and adolescents (mean age ≤18 years). Studies may include:
KQs 4, 5: Children and adolescents (age ≤18 years) with major depressive disorder, anxiety disorders, or increased risk of suicide
A priori priority populations of interest include by age (children vs. adolescents), race/ethnicity, gender identity, and sexuality
|Interventions||KQs 1–3: Screening interventions with or without additional provider or patient-facing elements such as referral support, treatment guidelines, symptoms monitoring, and standardized treatment. Screening tools must be brief standardized instruments designed to identify persons with major depressive disorder, anxiety disorders, or an increased risk of suicide; self-report with or without parental report), clinician administered, or electronically delivered (<5 minutes if clinician administered, <15 minutes if self-administered) instruments are eligible
KQs 4, 5 (depression and suicide):
KQs 4, 5 (anxiety):
|KQ 1–3: Studies reporting on a screening instrument that does not have established validity and scoring mechanism or thresholds for use within clinical practice
KQs 4, 5 (all disorders): Other treatment modalities (e.g., exercise, light therapy, transcranial magnetic nerve stimulation, electroshock treatment, diet and herbal supplements such as St. John’s wort and other complementary and alternative medicine, social marketing, policy, system-level interventions, or adjunctive agents to enhance the effects of antidepressants)
Interventions involving components that could not be replicated in most health care settings, including environmental components (media messages, public signage), interventions on groups in closed (preexisting) social networks (e.g., in daycares, schools), or those requiring the parent to have the target condition
Pharmacotherapeutic agents that are not FDA approved for pediatric use (e.g., paroxetine, vortioxetine)
KQs 4, 5 (anxiety): Psychotherapy other than cognitive behavioral therapy
|Comparators||KQs 1, 3 (screening): Usual care/no screening
KQ 2 (depression and anxiety): Clinical diagnosis based on structured clinical interview by qualified professional using standard diagnostic criteria in place at the time of the study (e.g., DSM-IV or DSM-5)
KQ 2 (suicide): Assessment of increased suicide risk based on clinical interview by qualified professional
KQs 4, 5 (psychotherapy and care delivery):
KQs 4, 5 (suicide risk): Treatment as usual (the provision of standard treatment services not governed by a study protocol, but at a duration and level of intensity consistent with active treatment interventions) are also eligible
KQs 4, 5 (pharmacotherapy): Placebo (including placebo along with psychotherapy, when compared with the active agent plus the same psychotherapy intervention [e.g., CBT plus placebo vs. CBT plus medication would be eligible])
|KQs 1, 3: No comparator
KQ 2: Another screening instrument, nonstandardized clinical diagnosis (i.e., diagnosis not made based on existing DSM criteria at the time of the study)
KQs 4, 5: No comparator, active intervention (i.e., comparative effectiveness); for example, medication X vs. medication Y would not be eligible, nor would CBT plus medication X vs. CBT plus medication YKQ 4, 5 (anxiety and depression): Treatment as usual comparator groups where the comparator group receives standard treatment services that involve a reasonably standardized active intervention provided outside of a study protocol are not eligible
|Outcomes||KQs 1, 4:
KQs 3, 5:
KQ 5 (pharmacotherapy only):
|All other outcomes|
|Outcome assessment timing||No minimum followup||Not applicable|
|Setting||KQs 1–3: Recruitment from:
KQs 4, 5: Treatment in:
|KQs 1–3: Recruitment from:
Studies conducting school-wide or communitywide screening are not eligible
KQs 4, 5: Treatment in:
|Study design||KQs 1, 3: RCTs, CCTs
KQ 2: Studies of diagnostic test accuracy**
KQ 3: RCTs, CCTs, observational studies
KQ 4: RCTs
Harms of pharmacotherapy only: large (>1,000 participants) comparative cohort and case-control observational studies published after identified systematic reviews that include observational studies
|All other study designs
KQ 2: Psychometric development and internal (e.g., split sample) validation studies of new instruments; case-control studies (i.e., studies that limit the study sample to only those with and without known mental health symptoms)
KQs 1–4: Systematic reviews of RCTs (reviews will only be used to identify relevant studies)
|Study geography||Primary studies that primarily take place in countries categorized as “Very High” on the 2019 Human Development Index (as defined by the United Nations Development Programme)||Reviews in which >50% of included studies take place in countries not categorized as “Very High” on the Human Development Index|
|Publication language||English||Any language other than English|
|Quality rating||Fair- or good-quality studies||Poor-quality studies|
* We will summarize the effect of other non-CBT interventions for anxiety as a contextual question, using a best-evidence approach.
** We will catalog all studies reporting on instruments that otherwise meet all eligibility criteria, but our synthesis will focus on the instruments that are reported in more than one study.
Abbreviations: ADHD=attention deficit hyperactivity disorder; CBT=cognitive behavioral therapy; CCT=controlled, clinical trial; DSM=Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders; ED=emergency department; FDA=U.S. Food and Drug Administration; KQ=key question; RCT=randomized, controlled trial.
The draft Research Plan was posted on the USPSTF website for public comment from April 30, 2020 to May 27, 2020. Regarding suggested edits to the KQs, one commenter noted that screening is intended to identify those at increased risk for any of the eligible conditions (anxiety, depression, suicide risk, or a combination), not just those at increased risk of suicide. In response, the USPSTF edited the key questions to remove the qualifier “increased risk of suicide” and instead refers to “suicide risk.” One comment suggested a focus on implementation barriers rather than the effectiveness of screening. Although we agree that these factors are important, the review is intended to support a screening recommendation. Commenters suggested edits to the contextual questions (CQs) to improve clarity. In response, we revised CQ 2 to clarify that the term “minimal clinically important differences” refers to the smallest value of benefit to patients. We revised CQ 3 and CQ 4 to specify that the population of interest is children and adolescents. We qualified CQ 5 as being limited to evidence-based treatments and clarified that engagement with care in CQ 6 refers to returning for clinical evaluation and treatment.
Regarding suggested edits to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, one commenter suggested focusing on screen-detected populations in reviewing treatment literature. Although we agree that for treatment questions, screen-detected populations are ideal, the evidence is likely to be extremely sparse. As a result, we are not restricting treatment studies to screen-detected populations alone. One commenter suggested excluding clomipramine because it is not a first-line therapy; in response, we excluded clomipramine. Some reviewers asked about the exclusion of active comparators for treatment questions. The USPSTF considers comparative effectiveness to be outside of its scope. Commenters suggested several outcomes; in response, we have clarified that we will include validated outcomes for prespecified outcomes for KQ 1 and KQ 4 and have added false alarm and false reassurance to outcomes for KQ 3. Some comments focused on priority populations; the review will report on priority populations defined by age, sex, race/ethnicity, gender identity, and sexuality. Some comments highlighted the importance of context, applicability, type of intervention, and type of disorder. We will consider these factors in the analysis.